Stating the well know fact that “material reality” has no solid matter in it, but is only as I described semi-congealed energy and space, is a simple, well proven theory in physics which speaks physical truth. It is not an effort to “… use Simulation Theory to challenge Simulation Theory, and ultimately to PROVE it. Forgive me, but I find your wording a bit difficult to decipher.
As for me, I do not at this moment know ST, but I am about to. In my writing, I may talk in terms your see related to ST, but, not knowing ST, I have had no such intention.
The next time I mention ST to you, I will know better what I am talking about. Right now, due to the way I’m reading your comments, I’m wondering if ST denies the essential non material nature of the so called “physical world”. I understand how ST might call our physical appearance of reality a simulation, because it definitely is not literal as it appears.since it IS simulated and not literal solid material but merely does a great job of pretending to be real “matter”.
The “simulation” of reality presented by the appearance of matter as “solid stuff”, is very convincing and for very good purposes, to lend meaning to this earthly journey.