Rip Parker
1 min readFeb 24, 2023

--

This all sounds reasonable and hopeful, but I must question his source of information. He speaks of profound, hopeful matters, but how has he come to know these great conclusions? How do we determine that Sam and others of similar mind aren’t just constructing these wonders out of their imaginations, well intended though they be?
As a scientist I realize these subjects are outside the range of science, but nonetheless I am compelled to search for some rational basis for opinions of this nature. I think we always need to question the source of information that leads to conclusions regarding our fundamental nature.
Is this “revealed” truth or merely creative imaginative speculation that seems sensible and encouraging and therefore is quickly grasped by many and thereby becomes a meme of our culture?
Can we find objective substance in this presumption, or is it purely subjective?
I think 5D is definitively a meme, but is it a substantial meme?
Thank you VERY much for stimulating thoughtful exploration.

--

--

Rip Parker
Rip Parker

Written by Rip Parker

Geophysicist, lawyer, mediator, student of Jung, phenomenology, semiotics

No responses yet