Rip Parker
2 min readMay 18, 2022

--

Yes to all your points. I have written similar thoughts this year. Simultaneous with this encouraging, largely unconscious move to increased consciousness and unity which we are experiencing I see the counter balancing move of the opposite which we must seek to reconcile.

The opposite of which I speak is a worldwide movement to the "right", which we unifiers see as "wrong". It is wrongly called in this nation "conservatism". The movement of which I speak is toward loss of democracy and freedom. We see this movement especially in the USA and in Europe. This trend toward fascission and the dictatorship to enforce it is now controlling Turkey, and threatens all other European nations. It is already in control of Russia and China, North Korea and is growing in Africa.

This is to be expected.

Darkness is threatened by the light of spiritual unity. Darkness has no assertive power except to oppose the light. It can't shine a beam of darkness. It can only draw upon the darkness of men's souls to cast fear, anger, and violence upon the land.

As our hive mind continues to call us together, we must without fear or anger seek to share with the purveyors of the dark what we hold in common which call for a cooperative spirit. Divisions must be joined.

This is a real contest that must be faced.

Love is the answer for those with courage to risk it, but we also must be spiritually prepared to STAND OUR GROUND. We cannot be passive or weak, and when, as it will, the dark side attempts to push over the cliff, we must be prepared to, without anger, push back hard and relentlessly. The other side sees us as weak. They could not be more wrong. They have no idea of the strength and power generated by our Unity of Purpose.

This is not a game for cowards. Only courage uncovered by Unity and love can prevail, which we shall, but "...it may be harder than you think",as said Aslan.

--

--

Rip Parker
Rip Parker

Written by Rip Parker

Geophysicist, lawyer, mediator, student of Jung, phenomenology, semiotics

No responses yet